0

ARE YOU ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR A BUSINESS TALENT (SUBCLASS 132A) VISA?

Australia invites you to apply for permanent residence through a Business Talent visa. ​​These visas can provide businessmen that have a Significant Business History with permanent residency to establish a new (or develop an existing) business in Australia that can deliver exceptional economic benefits to the country and generate jobs.

Successful applicants will:

  • Have the opportunity to sponsor eligible relatives for permanent residency to live and work in Australia.
  • Be able to travel freely within and out of Australia while managing their day-to-day business directly or through an authorised representative. [1]

Australia also has many benefits for domestic and international businesses, which includes:

  • A stable political and legal environment, ranked as one of the top ten stable countries in the world based on its defence, economy and system power.[2]
  • A weaker Australian dollar in the past three years, making assets in Australia substantially cheaper for foreign investors to acquire and operate.
  • Favourable time zones due to its geographical location. Specifically, Western Australia is in the same time zone as about 60% of the world’s population making international business with Asia much more convenient.

For all states and territories in Australia, the criteria for applicants to be considered as having a Significant Business History is that they have net business and personal assets of at least AUD1.5 million and an annual business turnover of at least AUD3 million.[3]Each state or territory will then impose additional requirements relevant to their state.

Why Western Australia?

Western Australia has some of the most favourable requirements for prospective applicants.[4]For example:

  • Western Australia only requires AUD1 million of net assets to be in business within the state, unlike Victoria (AUD2 million) and New South Wales (AUD3 million).
  • Western Australia only restricts those businesses that exist only for the provision of rental properties or passive investment unlike other states, such as Victoria, which place additional restrictions on general importing, exporting of commodities and smaller project based property development businesses.

Generally, Western Australia requires the creation of at least one (1) new job for any qualifying business and two (2) new jobs for a property development business. Other states, such as New South Wales, require as many as five (5) jobs created within the city of Sydney or three jobs created in regional New South Wales.

Applications for Business Talent visas are assessed on a case-by-case basis and exemptions for certain requirement may be extended to applicants based on their individual applications and reasoning. To maximise your chances for a successful application and to find out how you can expand your business to Australia, get in touch with us at Tang Law in Northbridge.

 

[1] See Re Sheik Anis Iqbal and Minister For Immigration And Citizenship [2010] AATA 1029; Huang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] AATA 656.

[2] http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking [as at 6 January 2017], https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/non-economic-data/most-peaceful-countries?page=2 [as at 6 January 2017].

[3] Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 2, ‘Subclass 132 — Business Talent’

[4]For a list of Western Australian requirements, please refer to http://www.businessmigration.wa.gov.au/?cat=business-migration&page=visa-132-business-talent


ABOUT THE WRITER

Kelvin Tang has over 14 years’ experience practising law in Western Australia. He is the founder and Principal Partner of Tang Law based in Perth, Western Australia. Kelvin is a Registered Migration Agent (MARN: 1386452) and has extensive experience in providing migration advice to clients, advising on “Eligible Businesses” within the definition of the Migration Regulations, assisting migrants (investor of the business) with satisfying migration requirements, making visa applications and appealing cancelled or refused visas in the Federal Court of Australia, Administrative Appeals Tribunal and Migration Review Tribunal. Kelvin also has extensive experience in civil litigation, commercial and corporate law matters.

0

Case Study: How Our Lawyers Handle Commercial Disputes At Your Best Interest?

These cases studies are based on real life situations, client names and images may have been changed to protect privacy. Each case study generally represents the experiences clients will have, however, each client has their own subjective goals and requirements to suit those specific goals and requirements. Thus, these case studies may not be deemed to create any warranty or representation that any other clients’ experience will be the same as the experience identified herein.

Genuine Story

Mr Chan was a successful entrepreneur in China who entered into joint venture agreements with Mr Smith with respect to property developments in Western Australia.

After the first project, Mr Smith invited Mr Chan to roll over his capital and profits, in excess of $1 million, from the first project into a second property development project.
After the second project, from which multi-millions of profits were made, Mr Smith again invited Mr Chan to roll over all his monies in the project into a third property development project. Mr Chan disagreed and requested to have his capital and profits from the projects returned to him.

Mr Smith refused. To the surprise of Mr Chan, Mr Smith secretly removed Mr Chan as a director of the company as well as issued more shares to himself.

 

Mr Chan engaged our firm to assist him to recover his capital and the agreed profits. Over the years, Mr Chen has invested approximately $1.2 million into the projects.

Solution

We were instructed by Mr Chan to commence proceedings in the Supreme Court against Mr Smith to recover his capital and the agreed profits.
Simultaneously, we assisted Mr Chan to successfully obtain a Freezing Order against Mr Smith which prevented Mr Smith from disbursing his personal assets as well as assets (including substantial amount of cash) held by the company.
Mr Chan and Mr Smith were unable to reach an out of court settlement and the dispute had to be determined by the Supreme Court after a 10 days trial.

Outcome

Mr Chan was successful in obtaining judgments from the Supreme Court in his favour for a sum in excess of $3.1 million plus recovering $300,000 in legal costs.


About the Writer

Kelvin Tang

Kelvin has over 14 years’ experience practising law in Western Australia. He is the founder and Principal Partner of Tang Law based in Perth, Western Australia. Kelvin is a Registered Migration Agent (MARN: 1386452) and has extensive experience in providing service on Commercial Law, Dispute Resolution & Litigation, Family Law, Wills & Estate Planning and Settlements.
1 4 5 6